From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sebasti=E1n_Mon=EDa?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use vtable for eww-bookmarks Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:41:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ldx0vufd.fsf@sebasmonia.com> <8fde5a67-f778-f0c8-bcdd-ece08c95d369@gmail.com> <87h67nm4su.fsf@sebasmonia.com> <28ba395f-5c52-1fc8-a99a-9bae461520d8@gmail.com> <36a57a48-76ab-4254-b3bc-af1fff2d9b98@app.fastmail.com> <87ttb9k04u.fsf@sebasmonia.com> <86wmfkt6ei.fsf@gnu.org> <39071ad9-a369-2e2f-aa1c-779f8103b566@gmail.com> <87cyh8z9tg.fsf@sebasmonia.com> <87seq1alkl.fsf@sebasmonia.com> <36ff480e-0155-479d-87fb-9a85232dac47@app.fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12062"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Adam Porter , Jim Porter , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 07 20:42:41 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFTL-0002yS-TO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:42:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFSl-00017L-NJ; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:42:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFSk-000176-2Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fout-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.149]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFSi-0001CV-0r; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.phl.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7740A1140114; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:41:58 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:41:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sebasmonia.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1736278918; x=1736365318; bh=7TBICer3mP5UmELIQ0fhWULngDHkzlmp 3WWlv+w7wKU=; b=h8lA712wd21nm/kNxwmSUqciWqFNev38Db2VVuIbvWbRGhe+ oE1+nBPtDIJSSgnXWRoSxkdytVqkYHEybjSz6Oru+4hJVSSIxmBiu2/dRvAPkIxR 4pjhnGp2XVvQEhrcAqS3IJYGPRDLNmSo7XUS2QpJnt1bp47u2dSkOwcgGaG0oBqU 62Pl1n1/fswt3BXKcD1D6tHtDVnx5B1ZXrRJq6RpEZdqo/AmJKuyHKWxNP+FWnpE UOh/0ViHVsiZ+TZjs46lvN8m+CSTznAlWPF17S2gHhYEkPvCIJGoDTMQs+EDNAfS CPAm5/i4vuLJAcA/GeK0I2v9hsWBNWCRLU31Kw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1736278918; x= 1736365318; bh=7TBICer3mP5UmELIQ0fhWULngDHkzlmp3WWlv+w7wKU=; b=m w5PsTTOxn5R6QF//eNMwU85gXYvInqhckd5nytrs6F84FOkS6mPsQJV583BwwX8t Q9bahzST3diOZ9UtzOFvs4iJqxypgOyX+tNnD+t7Q+n2VR2i6+nwQ0PjO5rgVoim 8eICSBC4n6t1T0UqXZ5LLDgd1Wwaji9DLdfFA4niQg6AGnDNaxmr5XZCfmhVk4hW rtKhFHkvVMCiShbvp3njBA36WiDsYSkkhfd3oQCGCHIKIk5WQiHHS4aVgTjU2SiD wiBnb9jioEVxSs/O6Os6WxLxXzoOEQS9kkobXLJt9lunYvg2OBQe6g6xZc4AlEqi gyfIqOzGYCyD9gji1DnsA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudegvddguddvhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhgffffkgggtgfesthhqredttder udenucfhrhhomhepufgvsggrshhtihojnhcuofhonhovrgcuoehsvggsrghsthhirghnse hsvggsrghsmhhonhhirgdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptddtleethedvjefg keetudetffefhedugfehffelleeigeefueeitdelkeefudevnecuffhomhgrihhnpehsvg gsrghsmhhonhhirgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsvggsrghsthhirghnsehsvggsrghsmhhonhhirgdrtghomhdpnh gspghrtghpthhtohephedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepvghmrggt shdquggvvhgvlhesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegvlhhiiiesghhnuhdrohhrgh dprhgtphhtthhopehjphhorhhtvghrsghughhssehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthht oheprggurghmsegrlh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iab2c46da:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:41:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 7 Jan 2025 19:27:54 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=202.12.124.149; envelope-from=sebastian@sebasmonia.com; helo=fout-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327772 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Sebasti=E1n Mon=EDa writes: > >> lack of movement in this thread which is probably a >> gauge for interest in the change. > > I wouldn't necessarily interpret a lack of replies or a long > turnaround time as disinterest[...] keep in mind that all of us are > volunteers, and do this in our free time too. Yes, this is why I said "probably". Heck, even when I made updates to the patch, sometimes I took a long time to get to it :) But since Eli's latest ping and the subsequent conversation about deprecating EWW's own bookmark mechanism, I am thinking that maybe this isn't worth our collective time. Again, coming from a practical place! Regards, Seb --=20 Sebasti=E1n Mon=EDa https://site.sebasmonia.com/