From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sebasti=E1n_Mon=EDa?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use vtable for eww-bookmarks Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:27:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86r07osgcj.fsf@gnu.org> <87pln8v2wi.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7952"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, jporterbugs@gmail.com To: Visuwesh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 20:28:47 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tDqNa-0001wa-JT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:28:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDqMq-0000jX-Qd; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:28:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDqMo-0000j2-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:27:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.157]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDqMn-000276-0M; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:27:58 -0500 Original-Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.phl.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EE511400A5; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:27:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:27:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sebasmonia.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1732130874; x=1732217274; bh=wx1kkbtueRCA/X8MCNe+5H8baqVPYuey 6UFa2nbiTDo=; b=X0bCWkBQ/OlxvVO9I7U2C8zDSk38h0ya4CoPqKreTmnQ13Rr PxgglKN6Qp+D+bH8C/FFhiGNK2md5tnzl2X1BhTi9Eznv2jMvKmLwKOZ+70vhwbE O9DMUuvmnOomVgZKNxDiG7auZdJLm2LF8B+B8JFLfBvfWt2B2k5++3yyhDbF5AdL CoG5bxQUI4FdAm93SQ4emItW+UmlMNCnIQc5/rLtwKYPcMjahz/INkn44QB5+jZU LmQHSl0IbJEpPnoXVcDh93060X6yercdaxdvrShtlL1iNJQIxffwFHLX/7nlNCel ZzUgDgddYvPbxd8YX++hzu+KKbsjnjUTXRlZQQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1732130874; x= 1732217274; bh=wx1kkbtueRCA/X8MCNe+5H8baqVPYuey6UFa2nbiTDo=; b=M gnipYm56KlJbl/m+yQALA6p1qW681dfKM8Q6Hbv7MIM5C2UMh1FUtlvZ4Sd/19s7 Kmyrku7KeYfiIzAZkLhfuzglmWsC1Pp4SJtBEkZI+mJ2vNC7MVa/IGZDL4hJgadk I3sM1A6Rz32v9py30nSzTbyGOvMgq+35DzIKEr0jnuzXJ9o8SV0QWU5R5Pypg4be LjXbx2/TeKDdrWg3R+nW+5i9ZuDfcXCb8MeEVmNh9WcuKGn7JllGT03A01F5JlO9 sIMjOrcvmsZ/b+XydQCHWbXk3PxVz6+PTmRq08Pf/QzSV7g6emtqTPqmVD6JaoAM tu+J50eWi2tTlsZt083Vg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrfeeggdduvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgfgsehtqhertddtreej necuhfhrohhmpefuvggsrghsthhijohnucfoohhnvogruceoshgvsggrshhtihgrnhessh gvsggrshhmohhnihgrrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekteetkeegvdegheev ledtuefhvefggfekheekfeetveekieehieevtdethfeludenucffohhmrghinhepshgvsg grshhmohhnihgrrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehm rghilhhfrhhomhepshgvsggrshhtihgrnhesshgvsggrshhmohhnihgrrdgtohhmpdhnsg gprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehjphhorhht vghrsghughhssehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepvghmrggtshdquggvvhgvlh esghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegvlhhiiiesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthho pehvihhsuhifvghshh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iab2c46da:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:27:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Sebasti?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=E1n_Mon=EDa=22's?= message of "Wed, 06 Nov 2024 11:52:28 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=103.168.172.157; envelope-from=sebastian@sebasmonia.com; helo=fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325531 Archived-At: Sebasti=C3=A1n Mon=C3=ADa writes: > Visuwesh writes: >> [=E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=81=E0=AE=A4=E0=AE=A9=E0=AF=8D =E0=AE=A8=E0=AE=B5=E0=AE= =AE=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=AA=E0=AE=B0=E0=AF=8D 06, 2024] Sebasti=C3=A1n Mon=C3=ADa= wrote: >> >> Can the -> bitmaps in the fringe be removed from the new listing? It is >> ugly (and quite misleading too). Or is there a new column that is >> hidden in the new listing that is not shown in the screenshot? > > Thanks for the feedback, will look into it. I realized today that Jim P. replied to these emails and I replied back without including the rest of the addresses (again, ooops). I said "the reason for the fringe bitmaps was that some table elements were larger than the window width. That's because I made the frame small so the screenshot wasn't too big. And also I didn't capture the whole list, just the top portion." And Jim's reply: > Right. However, the fringe bitmap is present even on rows that would > fit entirely in the window. That's because rows whose last cell is > short have trailing whitespace to fill them out to the max width of > that column. I don't think that trailing whitespace is necessary (at > least not how EWW is using vtable), and if we removed it, you'd only > see the fringe bitmap for individual rows that *don't* fit entirely in > the window. >=20 > - Jim I think we could tackle this vtable issue separate from the eww-bookmark changes. But open to your suggestions. All of you, now that I included everyone =F0=9F=99=83 Thanks, Seb --=20 Sebasti=C3=A1n Mon=C3=ADa https://site.sebasmonia.com/