Re: Default lexical-binding to t

["Sebastián Monía" <sebastian@sebasmonia.com>]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Sebastián Monía <sebastian@sebasmonia.com>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> >> From: Sebastián Monía <sebastian@sebasmonia.com>
>> >> Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> > Most people load files without first fisiting them, so I still
>> >> > think the load time warning idea has some advantage.
>> >> 
>> >> They _really_ shouldn't do that, though... :)
>> >
>> > Why not?
>> 
>> Isn't it general considered a bad idea to run arbitrary code without
>> taking a look first?
>
> Don't you do that with all the Lisp files that come with Emacs?

Yes! but in this context I understood Andrea meant "loading some random
lone file", which is different from a vetted (or at least, well known)
package, and very different from code included with Emacs.

If some file has no explicit binding cookie, it is relativaly old, maybe
even unmaintaned. No? Since using explicit lexical binding has been the
recommendation for a while now.


-- 
Sebastián Monía
https://site.sebasmonia.com/