From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Steingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: screen & emacs Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:54:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k4hh4thk.fsf@sysu76.podval.org> <83tyglathl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: sds@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296765115 6147 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2011 20:31:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Chad Brown Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 03 21:31:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl5qF-0005GF-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:31:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60629 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pl5GC-00028L-7i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:54:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50586 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pl5Fy-00026c-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:54:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl5Fw-0005tP-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:54:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:37657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl5Fv-0005sw-3I; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:54:15 -0500 Original-Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so926497vws.0 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:54:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to :x-attribution:x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=1mliQ5Wwe6eURvZFlzKzXC5gUj9BVbzMoghXQjzNXpk=; b=xivwdgP7ws2KFOY6XZjlm3XXTXbeGKKyIrJJlRf3MEay9TsyvK5aQAaiwB8tJtoQ09 ZtOtVo0CRj7K5YBWVokns4DM/eHj8o3cO4XOxpqlPptjQIW15HH8mjyMETMspRLrPs14 XtjyF33NiMF73J+WsVaCkRpkKxRWts9rb1yh0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=pRHwdQEPJQmx8SS2fmkN8nZaFhS1AjAsNktSZ5lfFVQRCz2I0XkIQa3OowinNfpclg +ETQ2SfO08U9iOVhtFY1xmhnA/0DplwDe6aaPJnFdH2RlDqAJ//vpTCpPMxKN6h/8HNG yiWlfnkeKbuWcbMbK6X4e7bhnnhkYVFg719uY= Original-Received: by 10.220.70.147 with SMTP id d19mr2867501vcj.76.1296762852839; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:54:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from tbox.m2.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bq5sm498337vcb.8.2011.02.03.11.54.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:54:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Chad Brown's message of "Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:25:11 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.212.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135520 Archived-At: > * Chad Brown [2011-02-03 11:25:11 -0800]: > > From: Sam Steingold >> >> 1. For many years I have been running emacs under gdb at all times. >> It appears no longer to be an option with -daemon. > > I used to do this back in the early days of emacs19 (and especially > under epoch), but I haven't actually seen emacs mysteriously crash in > quite a long time. I'm curious if this is an old habit or if you're > seeing less stability than I am (I don't push emacs nearly as much as > I did when I was programming full-time.) mostly an old habit which never hurts and sometimes helps: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:135126 -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.3 (Final) http://truepeace.org http://jihadwatch.org http://www.memritv.org http://dhimmi.com http://honestreporting.com http://iris.org.il He who laughs last did not get the joke.