From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r104691: Don't reuse previous Message-id when resending. Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:51:09 +0200 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87mxh37nfp.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87r56f10jd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <4E093222.3060302@gmail.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309284656 13911 80.91.229.12 (28 Jun 2011 18:10:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:10:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 20:10:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbckO-0006eS-4z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:10:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37851 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbckM-0007FR-Sq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:10:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbcQ8-0001Om-ET for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:49:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbcQ7-0003qC-4k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:49:56 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbcQ6-0003q7-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:49:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbcQ5-0006Jq-Md for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:49:53 +0200 Original-Received: from 85.183.18.158 ([85.183.18.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:49:53 +0200 Original-Received: from rileyrg by 85.183.18.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:49:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.183.18.158 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DWOF2dcP2XtcKoARP9RCdasKkqk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141142 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > You should reconsider that decision. Stephen's message cogently > explains _exactly_ why the behavior specified in the RFC is also the > right thing to do. > > I don't know what it explains, and I am not going to try to find out. > I am not going to read a long, arrogant and hostile message, some of > which is clearly based on false premises, to see if any parts of it > might be valid. > > If he thinks I am wrong, and wants me to pay attention to his opinion, > he should present it to me in a way that isn't hostile and doesn't > waste my time. And he should recognize that Emacs maintenance decisions > do not require his approval. Are messages being dropped from this thread? I saw no replies from Stephen that were rude or hostile, indeed in the circumstances polite and informative - you might learn something from them.