From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:05:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87oc6vm67v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296664429 11760 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2011 16:33:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 02 17:33:44 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkfeJ-00082n-Vi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:33:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55431 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkfeJ-0005BD-8O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:33:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53926 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pkds7-0003Bs-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:40:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkZat-000204-9r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from coquelicot-s.easter-eggs.com ([213.215.37.94]:38918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkZas-0001to-Or for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:05:47 -0500 Original-Received: from cigue.easter-eggs.fr (cigue.easter-eggs.fr [10.0.0.33]) by rose.easter-eggs.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E17140EE; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:05:42 +0100 (CET) Mail-Followup-To: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87oc6vm67v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:05:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 213.215.37.94 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135465 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 02 2011, Chong Yidong wrote: > There are a few more similar changes here and there. Any objection? I totally agree. I spend most of my theme in my Emacs theme file using :inherit to redefine fonts rather than (re)specifying various (new) colors. =2D-=20 Julien Danjou =E2=9D=B1 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNSSx3AAoJEGEbqVCLeKXCDy0QAIM4AYoBiABSCeHdcGvHLidj 3khLjqnbSzfVRzq5Q8uq3eX+QLbg5P8tYm+MdMJ+pPb/MhbV5E/hmTVNXi8khQ1w koEiPXaajzoQL0FNSMlceavR/e1ekxOx2l3sCClXvzWBXeOFssI1CI3Tn7rSI2fS DlI5+9Gtp/vuYsgp3us/p/qJ4Nx0mynQ8uACLTdXODpKG1dEubCR7ZM19NBnWenX n35cEYUVj/Lkd1SwUbhpQ0qpERtusTgNU2DbaYPtSeHJzZ73prInawR7i5CcDWzx rkimW+5X7m3v2JYV830ppTxADZbtbOQ9meypYYBpexB3KrJv8ZyC5sXThBnyXYXI qLUYNLYM34sWQS8SZakIStPSYQ7SdlNcEIofuUeWqbr2EAZ2jEGdMzOOoBnLQk62 w/tDD+dYsfJmkMsM0oHz6byk3t8fBbCDzRYrnQFw0L1GLn4JByEn+rtb8KT0KqJ1 ToSRaH/HnmpLpeDivV4zDOiu+8czoRNKsKFJeXxXyBUBMZ1zkK4OVEdCTMyM09a7 Pdw3Ie5yzmaEX+tP6wn30TC9umR+x1oP4Nd3m63J0L8tqK2Gr7NV+lNAM543GMeD od+4V0/Yj/tUl9NWwH0arfklC5dyUGWt64I45gNR0UheU1Yem+hUdBBO49DWiU+4 EUsyWdhrJSgwczKXSTsQ =shNS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--