From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Service names on machines with bad service files Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:07:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316426870 17947 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2011 10:07:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 19 12:07:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5alJ-0006KA-Fz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:07:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49727 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5alI-0006M0-Dn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5alF-0006Lk-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:07:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5alB-0001bN-SC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174]:57579 helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5alB-0001a4-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:07:33 -0400 Original-Received: from cigue.easter-eggs.fr (coquelicot-a.easter-eggs.com [82.235.59.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 103DC5C0E4; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:07:30 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:40:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 212.85.154.174 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144093 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > This would be very easy to do. It would mean making a new C-level > function that basically just calls getservbyname and returns the port > number. So nnimap would the call `open-network-stream' with > (or (service-port-number "imaps") 993). > > That sounds quite nice, doesn't it? I tend to agree. =2D-=20 Julien Danjou --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOdxRiAAoJEGEbqVCLeKXCpsUP/0cxHoYRlp6TFjIRxxxtHBRX 595PpMp3x3vA7Pws1yu/VxvHXhSKFkwSUd4wNPATv84ggwl6C2Mbu/A17y3mv26A CERArmr31vjloY5+OuKAhNtRNj13km5JH3h07t7F8V3ZxIUenjVw1juHJ0tSGNsO 8a32Xukd3n/U4t2Y60htY6EsZfqK75WmWwbd+2SdxB+xATpJNnTMi9x2LfPht+q1 hXhuw5b9EB4SVctDUAbqtSB3oSsmtM69V92Tc6CW3wT7n6Jt/ByJARCR/zo3NF8C ZRZE/XoKtf6/t5kVN7xbgxs6bdYOakqxztUReij41Cde0gb60lujY+Z/zzV+ggjt XAMThLUyrdo8uOXZD4t8U+t7+X5Di7lUGTCN4WdZbt36ExnN4N+0xsVsD+ilVaK6 goPOjFnfYJs2H7voNksnqkyv0peB0QeK+4pLVsD7wmS15a87W36rS+BK52fFz8Q7 GuQVBOHopX/AFG8n4rYYE1MM5tZp14yUPn0Dvt6WR4LnfT/sUici9/kngsnsFiXa JJWFHbN5QLh8fhHggBIfc1KGsoddVmX5xt7vA3/8seGoUN2RamG7wGAw8al66o2g QsywdGWrFyKEoOegjXKiosnZvNG8ocHnUbTrLiOEG5F8gt7+GF2YkxkN7AOFHWb4 dhyakuTGzoYtejf5z7C9 =d0Vj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--