From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Steingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: *Occur in buf*? Date: 31 Jul 2002 11:33:13 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207261536.g6QFa4U08962@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xd6t83dyy.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <20020728011001.GA3415@gnu.org> <5xeldn7x5s.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200207310554.g6V5swA16517@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: sds@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028129636 6816 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2002 15:33:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org, simon.marshall@misys.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZvU2-0001lp-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:33:54 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZvmI-0001Be-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:52:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZvUR-0003Fd-00; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from h007.c001.snv.cp.net ([209.228.32.121] helo=c001.snv.cp.net) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZvTR-0003Cj-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: (cpmta 29230 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 08:33:15 -0700 Original-Received: from 65.114.186.226 (HELO glip.premonitia.com) by smtp.premonitia.com (209.228.32.121) with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 08:33:15 -0700 X-Sent: 31 Jul 2002 15:33:15 GMT Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <200207310554.g6V5swA16517@aztec.santafe.edu> Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6206 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6206 > * In message <200207310554.g6V5swA16517@aztec.santafe.edu> > * On the subject of "Re: *Occur in buf*?" > * Sent on Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:54:58 -0600 (MDT) > * Honorable Richard Stallman writes: > > > I know, but the idea was to rename the occur buffer automatically to > > include the name of the original buffer. E.g. *Occur: xdisp.c* . > > TRT, IMO, is to make `generate-new-buffer-name' mode-specific. > E.g., have a buffer-local variable 'uniquify-buffer-name' or a similar > property of the major-mode name, which would hold a mode-specific > function which is to be run in the buffer being renamed. > > This could be a reasonable idea. Do people agree that there > is a particular "right" behavior for any given mode? there is probably "right" behavior for most "*foo*" modes. for file-visiting buffers &c we can always resort to . -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat7.3 GNU/Linux Whether pronounced "leenooks" or "line-uks", it's better than Windows.