From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: bug bugs [was Re: ^M in the info files] Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:24:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: <00aa01c951a0$4535a2d0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231820769 32373 80.91.229.12 (13 Jan 2009 04:26:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 13 05:27:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LMas4-0003Y0-9K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:27:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50191 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMaqn-00024C-U5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:26:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMaqj-000247-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:25:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMaqh-00023v-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:25:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48246 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMaqg-00023s-Vr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54655) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LMaqg-0000Z5-PX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:25:54 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LMapP-0002Zy-Jm; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:24:35 -0500 X-Spook: anarchy investigation Forte codes BLU-97 A/B Dateline X-Ran: Z__mfULw9W_P'&7&5v!qGz?%(xZ-ukn~Wx\@3w0+Y~Nt>RR3Jcw,@]!glmraE@f#^9jbHZ X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:01:23 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107817 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Why won't the tracker get its act together and stop forcing us into > editing mail headers? It's been asked for repeatedly, but it doesn't happen. There seems no point even discussing it, all the points have been made. I know people shouldn't have to make this effort with headers, but I was only asking. I'm fed up of duplicate and triplicate mails, and large numbers of bogus bug reports that need merging. > I use the Rmail's `r' command, which replies to all the original > "To" and "CC" addressees. I don't use rmail, but rmail-dont-reply-to-names ...?