From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bidi Subject: Re: synchronizing emacs-unicode branch to HEAD Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 20:04:19 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200309082332.IAA27881@etlken.m17n.org> <200309091212.VAA29412@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1063136619 28558 80.91.224.253 (9 Sep 2003 19:43:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, emacs-unicode@gnu.org, emacs-bidi@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 09 21:43:37 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19woOn-00080p-00 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 21:43:37 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19woOq-0001kx-00 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 21:43:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19woO9-0007fF-Ut for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:42:57 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19wnnB-0005wk-AY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:04:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19wnmy-0005sI-FO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:04:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [148.79.80.39] (helo=albion.dl.ac.uk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19wnmq-0005nq-09; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:04:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fx by albion.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19wnml-0003l5-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 20:04:19 +0100 Original-To: Kenichi Handa User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16245 gmane.emacs.bidi:172 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16245 Kenichi Handa writes: > I think we can test if c_functions is GC clean or not by > setting and resetting abort_on_gc before and after calling > that function. If you mean to do gcpro only when it's calling Lisp or specific C, I doubt that it is worth the trouble, especially as it could break with a newly-defined c_function. I don't think it's worth worrying about optimizing use of gcpro. There are probably no modern systems where it can't be turned off if anyone cares, at least with gcc.