unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TODO additions
Date: 03 Dec 2002 10:58:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <rzqwumrs723.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E18Isn7-0007aH-00@fencepost.gnu.org

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     > Which precisely are the versions that are inconsistent?
> 
>     The s390 config file is different and differently named and the
>     changes in the hp800.h file are different.
> 
> I am confused now.  What does "inconsistent" mean?
> Are you saying that the s390 config file is different in two
> versions of Emacs?  If so, what are these two versions?

The machine file for the configuration s390-*-linux-gnu which is
supplied by the Debian patch to Emacs 21.2 is not the same as
src/m/ibms390.h in the Emacs tree.  It has different contents and a
different name.

> 						I've no evidence anything
>     in the Emacs head versions is wrong.
> 
> If it isn't broken, then perhaps it is best if we do not fix it.

Of course.  The issue is the release branch, which doesn't have
support for these configurations.  I was only comparing the Debian
changes to support them with the changes that have been installed in
the Emacs head.

> I would rather not add any new targets there if it isn't trivial to
> do so.

I thought GNU targets might be wanted, especially since 21.2
introduced non-GNU new targets.  mipsel is trivial, though I can't
test it.  The changes for s390 and hp800 might count as trivial -- I
don't know.  I guess the original revision of m/ibms390.h would just
drop in to the 21.3 source with a trivial change to configure.in.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-03 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-18 12:41 TODO additions Dave Love
2002-10-19  3:24 ` Miles Bader
2002-10-21 13:11   ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-22 16:47   ` Dave Love
2002-10-21 13:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-21 13:21   ` Oliver Scholz
2002-10-22 14:14     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-22 17:03   ` Dave Love
2002-10-27 23:38 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-29 18:04   ` Dave Love
2002-10-29 22:09     ` Miles Bader
2002-10-31 17:25       ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 10:59       ` Dave Love
2002-10-30 17:18     ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31  7:21       ` Kai Großjohann
2002-10-31  9:12         ` Miles Bader
2002-11-01  9:40         ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-01 13:06           ` Kai Großjohann
2002-11-03 13:57             ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:19       ` Dave Love
2002-11-02  3:32         ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 20:15           ` Dave Love
2002-11-12 13:18             ` Miles Bader
2002-11-14  4:10               ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:47               ` Dave Love
2002-10-30 17:18     ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:42       ` Dave Love
2002-11-02  3:31         ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 11:37           ` Dave Love
2002-10-29 19:02   ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-31 17:27     ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:10     ` Dave Love
2002-11-02  3:31       ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 11:33         ` Dave Love
2002-11-07  4:48           ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 10:33             ` Andreas Schwab
2002-11-08 12:06               ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 11:58                 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-11-13 11:31                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:49                     ` Dave Love
2002-11-11 20:25                 ` Dave Love
2002-11-13 11:32                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:56                     ` Dave Love
2002-11-18 19:09                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-20 17:10                         ` Dave Love
2002-11-21 17:12                           ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-24 18:57                             ` Dave Love
2002-11-25 12:36                               ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-27 23:38                                 ` Dave Love
2002-11-29 15:04                                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 19:57                                     ` Dave Love
2002-12-01  9:16                                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 14:02                                         ` Dave Love
2002-12-05 15:10                                           ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-09 19:03                                             ` Dave Love
2002-12-12 17:09                                               ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-15 17:23                                                 ` Dave Love
2002-12-01  9:16                                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 14:05                                         ` Dave Love
2002-12-02 15:47                                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-06 16:41                                         ` movemail re-write [was Re: TODO additions] Dave Love
     [not found]                                           ` <E18LD0N-0004Rc-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
2002-12-10 23:42                                             ` Dave Love
2002-12-16 10:49                                           ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-12-17 18:44                                             ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-18  9:35                                               ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-12-19 18:32                                                 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 15:47                                       ` TODO additions Richard Stallman
2002-12-03 10:58                                         ` Dave Love [this message]
2002-12-05 15:10                                           ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 15:04                                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-27 15:13                           ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-28  1:43                             ` Miles Bader
2002-11-28  5:45                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-29 15:03                             ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 15:59                               ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-30 14:05                                 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07  4:48           ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 20:19             ` Dave Love
2002-11-13 11:32               ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:47                 ` Dave Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=rzqwumrs723.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk \
    --to=d.love@dl.ac.uk \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).