From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 64-bit lossage Date: 17 Jul 2002 12:24:57 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207021945.g62JjkK01982@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026905143 10736 127.0.0.1 (17 Jul 2002 11:25:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17UmwA-0002n3-00 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:25:42 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Un7Y-0003So-00 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:37:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Umvv-0007oa-00; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 07:25:27 -0400 Original-Received: from albion.dl.ac.uk ([148.79.80.39]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UmvT-0007nH-00; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 07:24:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fx by albion.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UmvS-00065C-00; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:24:58 +0100 Original-To: rms@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5822 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5822 Richard Stallman writes: > I don't know if we have anyone who supports 64-bit platforms. In principle I do -- at least Tru64 -- but I know there's commercial interest in them, and I'm not in a position to sort this out. (Debian supports at least Alpha, SPARC, MIPS and IA64 of the 64-bit architectures I know of, though I don't know if MIPS has 64-bit userland.) > We may have to wait until someone who cares about those platforms > wants to debug the problem. This sort of breakage would be a lot easier to deal with if someone tested the codebase regularly on such platforms, as I used to; I'd be surprised if no-one else has them available. In my experience it's typically much easier if you can narrow down when it occurred and look for suspicious changes. Going months without being able to build on Alphas is bad news.