From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: enhanced select-safe-coding-system Date: 02 May 2002 23:41:57 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200205010714.g417Eq607434@aztec.santafe.edu> <2561-Wed01May2002192739+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020379542 8698 127.0.0.1 (2 May 2002 22:45:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 22:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 173PKY-0002GB-00 for ; Fri, 03 May 2002 00:45:42 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 173PPy-00076U-00 for ; Fri, 03 May 2002 00:51:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 173PK6-0000lr-00; Thu, 02 May 2002 18:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from djlvig.dl.ac.uk ([148.79.112.146]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 173PH0-0007ll-00; Thu, 02 May 2002 18:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fx by djlvig.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 173PGv-0003vb-00; Thu, 02 May 2002 23:41:57 +0100 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1.95 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3518 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3518 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > Shouldn't we disallow saving a file whose coding: says something > different from the actual encoding? Is there any situation when such > a file means anything but trouble when it is visited? Yes, but anyhow it surely can't be right absolutely to prevent users saving files. `coding:' tags aren't the only thing `set-auto-coding' can note.