From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Cc: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>, Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>,
rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: cc-vars.el
Date: 20 Nov 2002 16:40:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rzqfztw42kv.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5b65utkyqt.fsf@lister.roxen.com
Martin Stjernholm <mast@lysator.liu.se> writes:
> I got bugged by users enough to come up with the whole cc-bytecomp
> kludge, at least.
Why do users care about how the package is compiled? If they worry
about compilation warnings, they should be told not to unless they've
determined that they really indicate a bug.
> What would be the problem of adding a macro in the
> bytecomp environment to control the warning aspect only?
You can already turn off warnings (and CL actually has `declare'), but
doing that covered up bugs in W3, for instance.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-20 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E18CrrF-0005AT-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <rzqwunberel.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
2002-11-18 0:57 ` cc-vars.el Kenichi Handa
2002-11-18 19:09 ` cc-vars.el Richard Stallman
2002-11-18 19:51 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-18 22:15 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-19 1:40 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-19 15:45 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-19 16:57 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-19 21:58 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-20 2:22 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-20 13:58 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-20 15:43 ` cc-vars.el Kim F. Storm
2002-11-20 15:01 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-20 16:37 ` cc-vars.el Kim F. Storm
2002-11-24 19:32 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-24 19:30 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-20 21:29 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-20 21:44 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-22 1:51 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-21 17:12 ` cc-vars.el Richard Stallman
2002-11-21 18:55 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-22 2:00 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-20 16:40 ` Dave Love [this message]
2002-11-20 16:35 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-19 16:59 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-20 21:14 ` cc-vars.el Richard Stallman
2002-11-24 19:33 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-20 21:41 ` cc-vars.el Miles Bader
2002-11-24 19:36 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-19 7:49 ` cc-vars.el Kai Großjohann
2002-11-19 16:55 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-19 20:35 ` cc-vars.el Martin Stjernholm
2002-11-20 9:46 ` cc-vars.el Kai Großjohann
2002-11-21 17:12 ` cc-vars.el Richard Stallman
2002-11-20 16:38 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
2002-11-18 22:17 ` cc-vars.el Stefan Monnier
2002-11-19 17:01 ` cc-vars.el Dave Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=rzqfztw42kv.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk \
--to=d.love@dl.ac.uk \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=handa@m17n.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).