From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes Date: 18 Jul 2002 17:02:59 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027008205 29856 127.0.0.1 (18 Jul 2002 16:03:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17VDkS-0007lR-00 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:03:24 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17VDwQ-00014r-00 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:15:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17VDkP-00022F-00; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:03:21 -0400 Original-Received: from albion.dl.ac.uk ([148.79.80.39]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17VDk4-00021b-00 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:03:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fx by albion.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17VDk3-0005W3-00 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:02:59 +0100 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5864 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5864 There have been various pervasive changes recently which will cause grief merging the unicode branch eventually. Could people doing this for Mule-related files (including display) please be prepared to modify the `emacs-unicode' branch too. I don't know if handa would like to be consulted beforehand, but I assume he'd appreciate having it done now, with less problems later on. (I guess the same would go for other active branches, if there are any.) Thanks. [In case this doesn't sound reasonable, I expect others with as much experience would agree. Even trivial global renaming of things can cause trouble. Some of the changes that have been made don't look trivial and would probably need their authors consulting anyhow if someone else did the work.]