From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: --without-xim is ignored. Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 23:48:02 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200307020505.OAA12367@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1057720275 8349 80.91.224.249 (9 Jul 2003 03:11:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 03:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 09 05:11:11 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19a5MB-00029n-00 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 05:10:59 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19a5Wo-0002kl-00 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 05:21:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19a50P-0003IC-B1 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 22:48:29 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19a4dC-0004g0-Kl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 22:24:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19a3WN-0004Wn-BH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 21:13:54 -0400 Original-Received: from gnuftp.gnu.org ([199.232.41.6]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19a39f-0008DW-Bw; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:49:55 -0400 Original-Received: from albion.dl.ac.uk ([148.79.80.39]) by gnuftp.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19a1Fj-0001oV-1Z; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 18:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fx by albion.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19a1Fi-00046I-00; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 23:48:02 +0100 Original-To: rms@gnu.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15507 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15507 Richard Stallman writes: > I guess not, now that it's a runtime option. What was the intention > of that configure option? > > I don't see a need for a build-time option if we have a run-time option. Indeed. What I meant, was to ask why exactly that option was added originally, e.g. was it for build errors or crashes under some circumstance?