From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bytecomp warning for CL functions Date: 29 Jul 2002 23:46:37 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200206261410.g5QEASU11961@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200207081819.g68IJxN12844@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207191654.g6JGsH326961@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027982817 9793 127.0.0.1 (29 Jul 2002 22:46:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZJI0-0002Xq-00 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:46:56 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZJZR-0001fR-00 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:04:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZJIP-0004B8-00; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from albion.dl.ac.uk ([148.79.80.39]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZJHi-00048A-00; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fx by albion.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZJHh-0006fz-00; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 23:46:37 +0100 Original-To: rms@gnu.org Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6154 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6154 Richard Stallman writes: > The way I changed your code, it warns about run-time calls to CL > functions from a file that doesn't necessarily load CL at run time. I don't understand. Surely my change did that anyhow? It just looked at the expanded, optimized forms. Not that I care, as long as you can get useful warnings.