From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [BUG] widget-field-overlay becomes wrong Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 18:24:14 +0200 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <40E28BE8.4030300@math.ku.dk> <40EF09AA.3010207@math.ku.dk> <40F4DA0F.5000608@math.ku.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1090599918 12142 80.91.224.253 (23 Jul 2004 16:25:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 23 18:25:06 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bo2r3-00075n-00 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 18:25:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bo2tu-0002sA-3Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bo2te-0002rh-Sw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:27:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bo2tU-0002pv-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:27:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bo2tU-0002ps-QW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bo2qM-0007li-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:24:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bo2qH-0007Sf-00 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 18:24:21 +0200 Original-Received: from sheridan.dina.kvl.dk ([130.225.40.227]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 18:24:16 +0200 Original-Received: from abraham by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 18:24:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sheridan.dina.kvl.dk X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5ol6ytmgXXxd77JMnhSAmSYocMM= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25906 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25906 Richard Stallman writes: > > ! In an @code{editable-field} widget, the editable field is not allowed > > ! to be adjacent to a neighbouring widget, there must be some text in > > ! between. > > That's not true. There can be a widget next to it, as long as the > text is static. > > Could you try rewriting this text? > If you use terms like "static", it's important to state > which widget types involve non-static text at the edges. My only idea would be a specific warning about the "choice" widget.