From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug in Custom Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:13:46 +0200 Organization: The Church of Emacs Message-ID: References: <200607010014.k610E6WN015030@jane.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1151872349 14934 80.91.229.2 (2 Jul 2006 20:32:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 20:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 02 22:32:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fx8cD-0002aR-TK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:32:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fx8cD-0008Tx-CT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fx6S6-0005O5-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 14:13:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fx6S5-0005Ma-NC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 14:13:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fx6S5-0005MU-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 14:13:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [130.225.40.227] (helo=sheridan.dina.kvl.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fx6fM-0001vc-O6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 14:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF8F13D31; Sun, 2 Jul 2006 20:13:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from sheridan.dina.kvl.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sheridan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19290-03; Sun, 2 Jul 2006 20:13:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (Postfix, from userid 304) id 14DD513D00; Sun, 2 Jul 2006 20:13:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: <200607010014.k610E6WN015030@jane.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:14:06 -0500 (CDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at dina.kvl.dk X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:32:15 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56380 Archived-At: Mixing Lisp and Customize for modifying the same option will always result in surprising behavior, no matter what semantics is chosen. My only advice would be: don't do that.