From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Customizing key bindings Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:52:38 +0200 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020903130247.GA6318@gnu.org> <20020903173120.GA29981@gnu.org> <87ptvttnyo.fsf@emacswiki.org> <200209061736.g86HaDi00352@rum.cs.yale.edu> <874rd1ki2s.fsf_-_@emacswiki.org> <20020907234343.GC26845@gnu.org> <87k7ltiv7c.fsf@emacswiki.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031734442 20444 127.0.0.1 (11 Sep 2002 08:54:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17p3G4-0005JM-00 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:54:00 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17p3qt-00063r-00 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:32:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17p3GA-0005Av-00; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 04:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17p3Er-0004zy-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 04:52:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17p3Eo-0004yQ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 04:52:43 -0400 Original-Received: from sheridan.dina.kvl.dk ([130.225.40.227]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17p3Eo-0004yI-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 04:52:42 -0400 Original-Received: from zuse.dina.kvl.dk (zuse.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.245]) by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id KAA03919 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:52:41 +0200 Original-Received: (from abraham@localhost) by zuse.dina.kvl.dk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id KAA22232; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:52:38 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: zuse.dina.kvl.dk: abraham set sender to abraham@dina.kvl.dk using -f Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 10 Sep 2002 23:05:21 -0400") Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.1 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7845 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7845 Richard Stallman writes: > Now, if #2 had been difficult to do, > then we would have returned to #1. But #2 was rather easy to do. > This is why I see no reason to do #1 at the moment. > > It seems that that #1 gives a cleaner behavior than #2. > > You're arguing that it won't matter in practice. Perhaps that is > true. We can install #2 now (since we have it), and switch to #1 (which I agree is cleaner) if approach #2 proves to cause problems in practice. The interface is the same as far as I can see, so it would be a clean switch.