From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Patch to cus-edit.el Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:20:03 +0100 Organization: The Church of Emacs Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014542629 10759 195.204.10.66 (24 Feb 2002 09:23:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Feb 2002 09:23:49 GMT Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16eusm-0002nR-00 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:23:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16euqL-0005AL-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 04:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from sheridan.dina.kvl.dk ([130.225.40.227]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eupF-00058J-00 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 04:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from ssv2.dina.kvl.dk (ssv2.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.226]) by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id KAA28530; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:20:04 +0100 Original-Received: from abraham by ssv2.dina.kvl.dk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16eup9-0000W8-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:20:03 +0100 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ Original-Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1478 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1478 I added custom-unlispify-remove-prefixes to the custom-buffer customize group, because I looked for it in that group and couldn't find it. In general, is it necessary to ask for permission to commit small improvement to the customize specifications like this? That is, adding :group and :link entries to defcustoms, or improving :type entries? Is there even any reason to mention I do it here? I will add ChangeLog entries, of course. 2002-02-24 Per Abrahamsen * cus-edit.el (custom-unlispify-remove-prefixes): Add to `custom-buffer' customize group. *** cus-edit.el.~1.144.~ Mon Feb 11 16:10:33 2002 --- cus-edit.el Sun Feb 24 09:30:47 2002 *************** *** 431,436 **** --- 431,437 ---- (defcustom custom-unlispify-remove-prefixes nil "Non-nil means remove group prefixes from option names in buffer." :group 'custom-menu + :group 'custom-buffer :type 'boolean) (defun custom-unlispify-menu-entry (symbol &optional no-suffix) _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel