From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: splitting ChangeLogs Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:22:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83k4f8uls8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302110573 23847 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2011 17:22:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 17:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 19:22:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7WRM-0004RB-Ue for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:22:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7WRM-0001NK-AD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:22:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48011 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7WRE-0001Lt-4S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:22:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7WRD-00089J-5m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:58864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7WRD-00089F-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40687) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7WRC-0008DA-PQ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:22:38 -0400 X-Spook: ANDVT undercover global Compsec eternity server X-Ran: ,"d,e?kbXK0?wHS9ezh!"AA|J^uLghrCbOD(k~CW[W5 X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:15:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138257 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 06:01, Glenn Morris wrote: > >> PS Why does it matter if ChangeLogs get larger than 1MB? > > On one hand, it's faster to work with a smaller file. On the other, > and more importantly, committing changes that include the ChangeLog is > also faster. OK. I noticed that with CVS, haven't really noticed it with bzr though.