From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's handling of line numbers [from bug#5042] Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:17:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <837ho6czb6.fsf@gnu.org> <8339yucbsg.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrw5bxkc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271539080 10835 80.91.229.12 (17 Apr 2010 21:18:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mark.lillibridge@hp.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 17 23:17:58 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3FOo-0000QA-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:17:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38603 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O3FOn-0007T5-3z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:17:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O3FOi-0007RO-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:17:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56823 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O3FOg-0007Pg-3B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:17:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3FOe-0005r3-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:17:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com ([209.85.218.225]:55304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3FOe-0005qv-Fk; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:17:48 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so3621848bwz.8 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:17:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dI3BJOHTFnhVs+QzCkftHHfWN8pTwXy7mVkjoUA6gO4=; b=bN1tatHPSkuFsZZmXnnAWlEIwGZw0JnVIkUGa8xdb57u6T4pTy6vIHm0f+QyFIVNuK 4SkrNy+MJj7Lm8MF8O2KxRRnO0eQaWl4ETR2gdUwqYTaD7RdHGPdH1N1IzdKXuyTmo82 KQ9E1xUDhVL1Z0vPKy2pRzht/tEM3YVJAOu6c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=rUUQ+8KPJPh/TsosW87pHfs8Cz+NTpKVC+KAZ3lqjf8gntKEbiXT+dewrdFpsfucWa 6UQD0M7RThIiiOh7pvzCV5+g4r57+dGvMYdCUS9CBMGNLNQXGDWj5LHzgkGMJtVLk/ay UrUCHFUpj9YkgJhblQexQLxyAlQMeqhYZCzyk= Original-Received: by 10.204.81.29 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:17:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83wrw5bxkc.fsf@gnu.org> Original-Received: by 10.204.9.152 with SMTP id l24mr3076457bkl.193.1271539066950; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:17:46 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123821 Archived-At: On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 23:04, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Why do you think they should be distinguished? It would perhaps be useful to distinguish between user narrowing and program narrowing (the one used by Info, rmail, etc., I mean). Or, put it other way, perhaps we need a narrowing facility for elisp code, separate and independent from the user widen/narrowing interactive command set. Juanma