From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r110286: Sync Org 7.9.2 from the commit tagged "release_7.9.2" in Org's Git repo. Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:58:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87pq5267ew.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87626uuol5.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <5fobkm9jnu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wqzat6n7.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87wqz9vxmm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87a9w4by89.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87zk447pz9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871uhgbwvz.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87pq50ahk6.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <26txuchi1p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ehlgagem.fsf@Rainer.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349204373 24792 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2012 18:59:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 02 20:59:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ7gX-0001tP-68 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:59:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49445 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ7gR-0006xE-Mf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60455) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ7gJ-0006sa-O4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ7gF-0001At-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:58:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:58338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ7gF-0001Ap-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:58:55 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ7gE-0004GB-EF; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:58:54 -0400 X-Spook: MD5 Glock clones clandestine HAMASMOIS CESID electronic X-Ran: DQUmk{WTO1/Po-KG;I0@1^\L=@y`j\G'|Rf*/`zwkc*O4+1=a;a@-\/@l`Ij>8([E2 (Achim Gratz's message of "Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:16:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153954 Archived-At: Achim Gratz wrote: > Again, if that's the case there should be no warning printed. Should I > open a bug report or feature request to suppress the warning if both the > let-bind and the local variable point to the same file? I wouldn't bother. A warning sometimes just means "this code use can be problematic, maybe you want to check it", not "this code use is definitely wrong, you should change it".