[alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and partial-completion-mode]

[alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and partial-completion-mode]

[Richard Stallman]

Would someone please fix this, then ack?

------- Start of forwarded message -------
From: A Soare <alinsoar@voila.fr>
To: "Emacs   Dev  [emacs-devel]" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Mon,  5 Mar 2007 15:18:24 +0100 (CET)
Subject: EVAL and partial-completion-mode
Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no 
	version=3.0.4

1. M-:
Eval: partial-completion-mode

=> t

2. M-:
Eval: (set-w-te <TAB>

=> Can't find completion for "set-w-te"

However, there is (defun set-window-text-height (window height)

So it must be added the completion from partial-completion-mode in this case.





_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
------- End of forwarded message -------

Re: [alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and partial-completion-mode]

[Chong Yidong]

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> Would someone please fix this, then ack?

I don't think partial-completion-mode has ever worked for this (i.e.,
completing Lisp symbols in M-:), has it?  It may not be trivial to add
this functionality.

> 1. M-:
> Eval: partial-completion-mode
>
> => t
>
> 2. M-:
> Eval: (set-w-te <TAB>
>
> => Can't find completion for "set-w-te"
>
> However, there is (defun set-window-text-height (window height)
>
> So it must be added the completion from partial-completion-mode in this case.

Re: [alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and partial-completion-mode]

[Glenn Morris]

Chong Yidong wrote:

> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Would someone please fix this, then ack?
>
> I don't think partial-completion-mode has ever worked for this (i.e.,
> completing Lisp symbols in M-:), has it?  It may not be trivial to add
> this functionality.

I think it's just because TAB is bound to lisp-complete-symbol in
M-:, which uses read-expression-map. Enabling recursive minibuffers,
PC-lisp-complete-symbol works as it should in this example.

(define-key read-expression-map "\t" 'PC-lisp-complete-symbol)

would get the desired behaviour.

Re: [alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and partial-completion-mode]

[Richard Stallman]

    I think it's just because TAB is bound to lisp-complete-symbol in
    M-:, which uses read-expression-map.

Actually it is M-TAB which has that binding.

Re: [alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and partial-completion-mode]

[Glenn Morris]

Richard Stallman wrote:

>     I think it's just because TAB is bound to lisp-complete-symbol in
>     M-:, which uses read-expression-map.
>
> Actually it is M-TAB which has that binding.

I was operating under the assumption that the OP meant to say "M-TAB"
rather than "TAB", because otherwise the bug report makes no sense.

Re: [alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and partial-completion-mode]

[Richard Stallman]

    I don't think partial-completion-mode has ever worked for this (i.e.,
    completing Lisp symbols in M-:), has it?

Indeed, TAB is not the way to complete a symbol there.
It is M-TAB.  Does M-TAB inside M-: work correctly when
Partial Completion mode is enabled?

Re: [alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and partial-completion-mode]

[A Soare]

> I was operating under the assumption that the OP meant to say "M-TAB"
> rather than "TAB", because otherwise the bug report makes no sense. 

Indeed, ALT-TAB.

ALT-TAB for the [alinsoar@voila.fr: EVAL and mouse selection in *Completions*] message also.

Alin Soare