From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Klaus Zeitler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Solaris 5.8 version hangs again (X resources for faces?) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:53:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87d4lgo8k9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87skub0w4t.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: kzeitler@alcatel-lucent.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216284841 27726 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2008 08:54:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 17 10:54:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KJPG6-0007BJ-JB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:54:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52747 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KJPFE-0005z5-53 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:53:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJPF9-0005yo-Sn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJPF9-0005yc-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40666 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KJPF9-0005yZ-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com ([135.245.0.39]:63410) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KJPF8-0003TM-Kb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:53:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (h135-1-218-53.lucent.com [135.1.218.53]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id m6H8rcJD022543; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:53:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from nbgif1.de.lucent.com (nbgif1.de.lucent.com [135.246.31.82]) by ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (8.13.8/emsr) with ESMTP id m6H8raPR018644; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:53:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sfsws1.de.lucent.com (sfsws1.de.lucent.com [135.246.31.38]) by nbgif1.de.lucent.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id m6H8rak19316; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:53:36 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from sfsw51.de.lucent.com (sfsw51.de.lucent.com [135.246.72.99]) by sfsws1.de.lucent.com (8.13.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m6H8rZ5v009386; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:53:35 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: (from kzeitler@localhost) by sfsw51.de.lucent.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.8.8) id m6H8rZS09153; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:53:35 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: sfsw51.de.lucent.com: kzeitler set sender to kzeitler@alcatel-lucent.com using -f X-Flame: I can't believe how sadistic you are. In-Reply-To: <87skub0w4t.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:45:22 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (usg-unix-v) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100874 Archived-At: >>>>> "Chong" == Chong Yidong writes: Chong> Chong> This is strange. It may be that the face code needs to Chong> handle this face specially. Will that be taken care of or should I file a bug report? >> Shouldn't the condition-case take care of the error? >> And another question: Shouldn't the window-system check, i.e. >> (memq (window-system frame) '(x w32 mac)) >> be outside the dolist? Chong> Chong> No, because face specs and custom face attributes can be Chong> defined even in terminals (X resources, however, cannot). Not sure we're talking about the same thing. I thought the frame parameter will not change inside this function (I can't see where it's going to change). Klaus -- -------------------------------------------------- | Klaus Zeitler Alcatel-Lucent | | Email: kzeitler@alcatel-lucent.com | -------------------------------------------------- --- If you cannot convince them, confuse them. -- Harry S Truman