From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:42:11 +0100 Organization: not if I can help it Message-ID: References: <87ipvwl1nx.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87ipvuwslp.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87hbbc0zi6.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <83oc5gsdwc.fsf@gnu.org> <87ei6bunxz.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <83tyf6rhgn.fsf@gnu.org> <84zkoy6tah.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87hbb5a4xq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <84ipvkx1da.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87d3ls7n3b.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vczdwjuk.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87k4fr3koi.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aagn2tpr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj07umkl.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d3ljujgk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjueua4i.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300869774 19314 80.91.229.12 (23 Mar 2011 08:42:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:42:54 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 09:42:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2JeT-0003f8-RZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:42:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36772 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2JeS-00073b-ED for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:42:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33324 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2JeF-00072K-5U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2JeC-00011P-Us for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:38944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2JeC-000118-Nu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:42:32 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2JeA-0003YK-52 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:42:30 +0100 Original-Received: from lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net ([81.56.191.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:42:30 +0100 Original-Received: from rpluim by lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:42:30 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) XEmacs/21.5-b29 (cygwin32) Cancel-Lock: sha1:t3dakTbxxVmegklLz5bJwMlO82w= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137558 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:56:16 +0100 Robert Pluim wrote: > > RP> Ted Zlatanov writes: >>> >>> Try the attached patch against proto-stream.el in the Emacs trunk. I'll >>> refresh my patch to add this change too. > > RP> That doesn't work for me. Just to be clear, I connect to my imap server > RP> on port 993 with TLS, it's not a connection that gets upgraded after the > RP> fact, so I suspect proto-stream-open-tls needs to change. > > Drat, the simple fix didn't work. Can you please set `gnutls-log-level' > to 4 and show the whole sequence in *Messages*? > That makes no difference at all in the messages. I think it's not getting to the starting TLS phase at all because of the hostname issue. Regards Robert