Possible Bug - The return of the \201

Possible Bug - The return of the \201

[Hans-Peter Binder]

I have a problem with current Emacs from CVS. When i start Gnus,
i see in the article-buffer, and only in the article-buffer, all
German Umlauts with a \201, like Umläüte.
This appears IMO since 10.02.2003. The Emacs built from cvs-10.02.03
have this problem, and builds before never have this on my machine.
I have tested this with Oort Gnus v0.16 and also with the built-in
Gnus-5.9. And I see the correct display when i use Emacs from CVS
build before 10.02.03.

There is a problem, but it has nothing to do with the Gnus
functionality. I'm pretty sure the problem is with the Emacs from CVS
since 10.02.2003.

Version of this emacs:
  GNU Emacs 21.3.50.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin5.5)
 of 2003-02-12 on hyperion.mac

Configuration options:
  '--without-x' '--enable-carbon-app'

Multibyte characters awareness:
  default: t
  current-buffer: t

Current language environment: German
Window-system: mac1
Coding system of the terminal: iso-8859-1

I have tried tests to set many of the language-environments and
coding-systems, but it fails too.

Any suggestions welcome.


Regards/Gruesse
Hans-Peter Binder
-- 
(coffee-mode 1)

Re: Possible Bug - The return of the \201

[Hans-Peter Binder]

* Hans-Peter Binder <tethys.pb@gmx.de> writes:
I followup to myself:

> I have a problem with current Emacs from CVS. When i start Gnus,
> i see in the article-buffer, and only in the article-buffer, all
> German Umlauts with a \201, like Umläüte.
                                   ^^^^^^
I mean't  Uml\201ä\201üte with a \201 before the Umlauts.

As i can see, the Problem not occured in Mails, only in News article
buffers.


Regards/Gruesse
Hans-Peter Binder
-- 
(coffee-mode 1)

Re: Possible Bug - The return of the \201

[Miles Bader]

Hans-Peter Binder <tethys.pb@gmx.de> writes:
> As i can see, the Problem not occured in Mails, only in News article
> buffers.

It's certainly showing up in your email, and I use Gnus to read email,
so probably the problem lies there (I'm under the impression that Gnus
has always been a bit flaky with respect to this stuff).

I assume this is related to the recent process multibyte changes.

-Miles
-- 
Is it true that nothing can be known?  If so how do we know this?  -Woody Allen

Re: Possible Bug - The return of the \201

[Hans-Peter Binder]

* Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes:

> Hans-Peter Binder <tethys.pb@gmx.de> writes:
>> As i can see, the Problem not occured in Mails, only in News article
>> buffers.
> 
> It's certainly showing up in your email, and I use Gnus to read email,
> so probably the problem lies there (I'm under the impression that Gnus
> has always been a bit flaky with respect to this stuff).
> 
> I assume this is related to the recent process multibyte changes.

Yes, of course, you're right.
I changed the files process.c, buffer.c and lisp.h from /emacs/src/ in
the current CVS to the versions one step before, and everything is ok
here.

See the ChangeLog entry 2003-02-10  Kenichi Handa  <handa@m17n.org>


Regards/Gruesse
Hans-Peter Binder
-- 
(coffee-mode 1)

Re: Possible Bug - The return of the \201

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <pb.m24r78p6ca.fsf@ID-42241.news.dfncis.de>, Hans-Peter Binder <tethys.pb@gmx.net> writes:
> * Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes:
>>  Hans-Peter Binder <tethys.pb@gmx.de> writes:
>>>  As i can see, the Problem not occured in Mails, only in News article
>>>  buffers.
>>  
>>  It's certainly showing up in your email, and I use Gnus to read email,
>>  so probably the problem lies there (I'm under the impression that Gnus
>>  has always been a bit flaky with respect to this stuff).
>>  
>>  I assume this is related to the recent process multibyte changes.

> Yes, of course, you're right.
> I changed the files process.c, buffer.c and lisp.h from /emacs/src/ in
> the current CVS to the versions one step before, and everything is ok
> here.

> See the ChangeLog entry 2003-02-10  Kenichi Handa  <handa@m17n.org>

Yes, I did a silly mistake in string-to-multibyte, sorry.
I've just fixed it.  Please try the latest CVS HEAD code.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
handa@m17n.org

Re: Possible Bug - The return of the \201

[Frank Schmitt]

Hans-Peter Binder <tethys.pb@gmx.de> writes:

> I have a problem with current Emacs from CVS. When i start Gnus,
> i see in the article-buffer, and only in the article-buffer, all
> German Umlauts with a \201, like Umläüte.
> This appears IMO since 10.02.2003. The Emacs built from cvs-10.02.03
> have this problem, and builds before never have this on my machine.
> I have tested this with Oort Gnus v0.16 and also with the built-in
> Gnus-5.9. And I see the correct display when i use Emacs from CVS
> build before 10.02.03.

I see the same problem with todays CVS head under MS Windows.

-- 
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.