From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Where / when Emacs on Gitlab? Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:40:08 -0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15401"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Emacs developers To: Psionic K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 11 17:40:47 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNy6o-0003ni-86 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:40:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNy6K-0002X0-UF; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:40:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNy6J-0002WZ-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:40:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNy6H-0000FI-Sl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:40:15 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6d9bba6d773so4788478b3a.1 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:40:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1704991211; x=1705596011; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fKeC5kR9UDBFu74ZrsG0l++xuLLNvXDdSudw0wGzd50=; b=yWf+/FAs8DXpozrn3cUqfMyF/zgBppsWbNK7xuClLj7+jJekJtf8XJGrFAkjWSVonQ lxm3DwYMeGr54PP/GSdnHW59jvK0YjUSlY+ePDNb8UqZSmACOtYcaKj9wtdcx2C9RFRa TD7wP5c7pu9z8OX7v3IaU0s4h15TJ845BskxAIv4S3uYYxugeod+3NaeV5sXysCccvcW 21AtJVAyn9VTC1KFfZ4IRwsuTB4hsdVgnPdoBZKHSlTnc3r0+YeaK8fHubCjbL1ZWHKK a4fhRjh+spVv9Wj7qbdHDCVtoUypD96H1DUr/Vj219dWlVKU2uF6QjVJkeA3XKnT01KN S5nA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704991211; x=1705596011; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=fKeC5kR9UDBFu74ZrsG0l++xuLLNvXDdSudw0wGzd50=; b=TZWBqFEyNhQkeKOtUm3UAUWDg2/kZfANbpQ2Ocac0i/LOHe0PGjcOSbxnc1qH/eXcV LAaBAfps0/i477eV6n/KmUFOvMA9DLHu6y6i715NsQ/m1y6tM/Y9fxErGpn55ThWYdIn ipo4Xnzmn6nUARuYrhuzeMTIjBYfc+zKOASzH2pihtUz8hB/HERuNC2ynMytM1Lj6QxX 20EObmN98uupF3SbuBoUsrDYT+3yU5cKabhGz1Vy01OT1pSSbKbcg3Pk4nBTA+jbZ/zK OHHj8OMK2BSFcRL/jI2hKPkvysQ3WqZRvTC6tJo9s4/P9HSdxiFdUAaZP/Sq4zjJr33t 6EmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxpUauPpw5Mz1CwAK2Dj9vhrzgj6836lP8fYqhSqhpZDAQsI37a C3YavSX8toOAikhnqb8rv6OdiWHcQpqx/niLjVPHL+4u2FM0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGH7Ng9TJqDeLjtBOhLhTynaom5Zn02NPVeeUD/MlfQOmwDYCsvtb8U+Yq8epWWmPrChPTz9A== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9199:0:b0:6d9:af31:293b with SMTP id x25-20020aa79199000000b006d9af31293bmr1277411pfa.61.1704991211235; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:40:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from raman9 (c-98-45-12-92.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.45.12.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c23-20020aa78817000000b006d095553f2asm1385316pfo.81.2024.01.11.08.40.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:40:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Psionic K.'s message of "Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:22:12 +0900") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::430; envelope-from=raman@google.com; helo=mail-pf1-x430.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -175 X-Spam_score: -17.6 X-Spam_bar: ----------------- X-Spam_report: (-17.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314862 Archived-At: To me the biggest issue with Web-2.0 style solutions is that they force you into a JS-obligatory browsers with all the other downsides that that brings along. So, yes, let's use a web-2.0 or even 3.0? where we make forward progress, but for emacs, perhaps e can use emacs/eww as the acid test for does it "keep us free of the so-called mainstream browser trap"? --