From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: raman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 25.0.04: Feature Request: Make called-interactively-p's argument optional Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:34:12 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467300876 31762 80.91.229.3 (30 Jun 2016 15:34:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rswgnu@gmail.com, Richard Stallman , emacs-devel To: Robert Weiner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 17:34:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bIdz5-0006zG-3y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:34:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51223 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIdz4-0000wW-Fd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:34:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIdyy-0000w4-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:34:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIdyt-0002Dt-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]:34072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIdyt-0002Db-P9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h14so30438844pfe.1 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:34:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=c9oBckAvKd5ZUD7tPxgVL/X2n5nRQFDAQU3lnHD2zKo=; b=NbILGP2sCUcVhQZiXWqG5FlcQTss9af8a/b1P+q+SaVDkcWZG/WwJiHID88KHvK70A f27pfNgC+NcKp12VeY0gHQwz0snLGqLf+ZUv4+IEfVx7dS2vVF+fEV2eYxP4kZDrXtal bDgirzXYKGYBkbY+9N3ZKz+O9M3sb7ff9snV5+ZcHpU/mzWG5lNoDeCaGKS+AUCb1y2/ 3uwEsaYGtbpiItwtrEA11lrwSO3cyOXGDN+CzgMxpXZFj3GOeaa1IyueHiKx5knmd64r j0L6LbkPbbC7xffrxjih6+z+OooOS8n/NI3whv39nsixfoh4QB2eoeu1I/rQLDLro1zk GA7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=c9oBckAvKd5ZUD7tPxgVL/X2n5nRQFDAQU3lnHD2zKo=; b=GjmK4oAHqcZM4dVNz/C8bv6uTR4bCMRUlZl/hQaLFrb5DJkdUxXXC29JxqPIfRm/lg 0SQ1imngwIOag7zJ11lqMr3InTNxJQgeGc6Xo4DR0i+nf8NwEct+otG552uetMAJNB2O mJKHh1oNwIAu7i6xJ6DxJtBPWgeV+me8Td34S3GTqVJElgIH+XNJttbCi8OxuEWBWNXq MK3mEFyQwV5+B58KhnarWB98IB/W/RjBW0iioXBVJhhWy0A7/Nl8smuHNkwNbIbzLyhN QcrgtUNVouGnImXWbwiy5AH4YC9RyOlSgS4IYcQIdy2S92gOFO0bE+mtTRThF/Md+XIF UaaA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLtSuAd8itFBrxDC59URC9lBXMIgH2AxQa1NXu80RpK1X4dbgoIfTV1zW7yYzS3GVIU X-Received: by 10.98.59.77 with SMTP id i74mr22285339pfa.45.1467300858704; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from raman-glaptop2 ([207.198.106.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id tj10sm6728023pab.21.2016.06.30.08.34.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:34:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Robert Weiner's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:25:26 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204994 Archived-At: Undeprecating it would be a good solution IMHO, but it was also rejected at the time, perhaps there has been enough water under the bridge that one could revisit that. --