From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A whole lotta auto-saving going Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:34:18 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8735zdyly0.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2h1vyhq.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb18030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18707"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Aaron Jensen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 10 19:35:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyfYu-0004kB-UE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:35:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59566 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyfYt-0007o9-Sl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:35:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53452) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyfXj-0007HC-Cc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]:52204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyfXh-0000fx-QP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id y12so2185390pji.1 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:34:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k/GNCwZ/tjcD6tYBxRrg2s1qEylxOlCId/uLJw6ylbk=; b=ooKDGcxEtjIzCVcqqy1rrgIcO3MUcEIgqgoRxgRWN9C1gUe9P4n6UY+fBneQ9TGNqG Yc1LDMQ4XCfg3JpJWDPrcXcf7N796u1IV1MvacYuz6Y5SppLfi5zhrbi16cD2VFG2UC9 dLXTREPrqiogYvFzVebVwS3GEWeyPJ2OGkDdUUX+8y0RLEbwNgB/oP/eTKDIkH1Tx2Dj y1i6ufSljrhJios8MOMgBpo3mNXJQVB/LdG6mhxu1IoGGkghEu/5SAQ5sG8GnFC7xzij MpLkvm5RbRAfuBhvMqvYn002B+qrlWTX+XYTcwxJKD7NXV9JWB2lqyx3B60+Ft00gjC+ ocVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k/GNCwZ/tjcD6tYBxRrg2s1qEylxOlCId/uLJw6ylbk=; b=A1ndYsjBswV6F7W2FE5I2PCwgOvrqxtstLRxUMJxeUMYhn25P9ZdVklewiuytJdN/x AXGBURq+nMrqbcagqHMButT+hlY8VcMgSPdFFWXHZ7wKOpiT+Vi38PP7PcX708JDgESF B3fXvkMaqmtgE9Ak7iWE6p1nalk8FSY8kI5fwu6D1J7TjPZeYkeykk9T64kBOd7X5hh7 ddd/CSwk8fHroBDBXgIUOeMuFXOWiMJlazxKn26ysPzZZwUwikeF/GkQ7r4YYU4REiu1 U8Ob/BZm35A8YW062a3+wlq1d3ztye7yD77PrAdAEY4uu10BdkMben9dPFmI4JZ0gcHj M29w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bLTCRo5P0JJKis1/GN5SQ21SCC89Ul4SSLa/psi1DA/6wyka1 TqnQ9DrCHmj9K+v1Gymm4r0XDg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbg2q59todFDvnmlVTGljtOBo950aT5ghX17mKiSXYaZ59wevv13FPpam5CEbTfNIrzMYy8w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c396:: with SMTP id h22mr14118719pjt.84.1610303660185; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:34:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from raman-glaptop.localdomain (c-24-4-174-65.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.4.174.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm15950598pfc.76.2021.01.10.10.34.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:34:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by raman-glaptop.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 13930) id 35176C22B70; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:34:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:18:28 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f; envelope-from=raman@google.com; helo=mail-pj1-x102f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -175 X-Spam_score: -17.6 X-Spam_bar: ----------------- X-Spam_report: (-17.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262873 Archived-At: Tangential (slightly) but given the repro case, perhaps relevant: Why is buffer-undo-list not set up to avoid saving undo information in shell buffers? AKA, should we have (setq buffer-undo-list t) in shell buffers? Perhaps even in all comint buffers? I dont think I have had reason to "undo" in a shell buffer, and even if I did, I dont quite know what that means. --=20 Thanks, --Raman =817=A94 Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 =950=DC8