From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "William Xue" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Help: build emacs in cygwin Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:49:54 +0800 Organization: wv Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173329454 9810 80.91.229.12 (8 Mar 2007 04:50:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 04:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 08 05:50:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HPAaW-0007Fl-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:50:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPAag-0002gQ-7f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:50:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HPAaT-0002eJ-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:50:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HPAaR-0002Xg-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPAaR-0002XF-Mw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:50:43 -0500 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.238]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HPAaG-0000Kc-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:50:33 -0500 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i20so627600wra for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:50:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:to:subject:from:organization:cc:content-type:mime-version:references:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=VyBbjGO9L+4ltoa0HacvzrM0BYojFxOeS3VtAh0K8dSTpstZ2df4o6h2rfbyXvYWHCvC4ANxn7gn2QMnifBx47ZPfWHAVKJ5RJlUtUBJB/MwKPGolmsPBW6d38hRG3YTqGwFlUeP+nJSWbojJE3scpLi3MToIv9nnu+IjsrVQp4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:to:subject:from:organization:cc:content-type:mime-version:references:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=bT1NS6KbmUMnCVhkoGw1mr0y9GNOwjkeNZIZ30RxpNVpKIf4SC/i9xc+kITIc7xqoouVN1UgzdPTB6F5I+psNCb1ns/p8ghOXhDtUpWZDNknSJcuzZr949tACQO6oshLXwDhEp/6bl7+Udtyy06WZXDNurnjwgLhCe2g+4R4dfs= Original-Received: by 10.114.137.2 with SMTP id k2mr2474135wad.1173329431236; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:50:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from williamnb ( [58.33.96.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t1sm3680778poh.2007.03.07.20.50.29; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:50:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.20 (Win32) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67558 Archived-At: On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:22:32 +0800, William Xue wrote: > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:24:28 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> >> This shows the problem very clearly: for some reason, the command that >> should have produced emacs.exe didn't run to completion, but rather >> finished prematurely (a.k.a. crashed) after loading only a handful of >> *.el files, the last one being mule-conf.el. >> >> The Cygwin build of Emacs is currently very troubled. In particular, >> only a few versions of GCC are known to produce a working binary. >> Please see the entry in etc/PROBLEMS whose header is "Building the >> Cygwin port for MS-Windows can fail with some GCC version". Also, you >> will find a few discussions in the archives of this list about similar >> problems that might help you find a solution. > > Thank you. > > I have checked the file and it seems that I should upgrade the GCC to > 4.0 first. > > I will try the newest GCC release 4.0.1.2 first. > I have successfully updated the GCC to 4.0.1.2, but the problem is the same. Maybe I should try a version mentioned in etc/PROBLEMS. -- Sincerely yours, William