From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Andryshak Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: string> missing? Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:11:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org> <87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org> <83sia8rdkm.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5crbfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0gr4eh.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9qor2kk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433362306 10988 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2015 20:11:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 20:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 03 22:11:32 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0F0U-00059v-1x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:11:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37745 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0F0T-0008OA-87 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:11:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42164) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0F0O-0008Lm-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0F0L-00061H-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:11:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vn0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::230]:41718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0F0L-000610-He; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: by vnbg7 with SMTP id g7so2636562vnb.8; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:11:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=LdDXAKtVmugRVFQa0SuHunCA9SsonWzvwPaypyiqwVk=; b=kA6vv78MivZJadzc5JB6fcgYnGRjbss7hkKcUIiUntURu0rUTFSKQHTXwwzpHk6tHB 2uZXA28IV/0X1GzmQs2H4AKGO7Poc6qyiYUPGjs204Fkj4/yMl4a+Og7+NZo1gH3Jh7r tPzwgfuHkjLXEBprIqvNh9L7bVqS/g0yy/deKnb4Pk4BuTC0LMi3X4NCKe/MxCqsNm8B SYkASLV0F7wI/EDoz4sksdfZBjyYCkGMyD+DNQwGEX6Q3bzmloqFIlMMb1qR6taRBJKK eaMfHkccN2BY7qRAYN5bMrgKjDkEnLPxifBUPnvpYY5d9ZHOnADXgjPOQz6nYPEo4pTh P/Zg== X-Received: by 10.52.104.7 with SMTP id ga7mr50008445vdb.16.1433362273118; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from NAND-LT ([47.19.134.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id st8sm2021058vdb.4.2015.06.03.13.11.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:11:12 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <83h9qor2kk.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187000 Archived-At: > Because they do. The cause is lost in history. > No, I don't agree. > That's exactly the point: there's no need to apply the same logic to > both cases. Those are entirely unreasonable answers. - Nick