From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; TRAMP fails to copy a gzip'ed file Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:16:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6351A346-5EE7-4B65-9742-B16C56D689A4@gmx.de> <0A425FC8-F47F-488D-99FB-FA357B21C856@gmx.de> <1663FCE9-D7C8-4E02-8A52-F6982A88049F@freenet.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205245059 4524 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2008 14:17:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Peter Dyballa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 11 15:17:57 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZ5Hj-0007WK-78 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:16:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ5HA-0004Jr-G9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:16:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ5Gn-0003xP-Vv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ5Gm-0003ut-2J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ5Gl-0003ud-PW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ5Gl-0000Rj-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ5Gl-0001t0-DT for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ5Gh-0000Qh-W1 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay1.alcatel.de ([194.113.59.95]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ5Gh-0000QH-HE for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: from slbhab.alcatel.de (slbhab.bln.sel.alcatel.de [149.204.63.218]) by mailrelay1.alcatel.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id m2BEFlVO022943; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:15:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1663FCE9-D7C8-4E02-8A52-F6982A88049F@freenet.de> (Peter Dyballa's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:43:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (hpux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 149.204.45.72 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92157 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21528 Archived-At: Peter Dyballa writes: > The output of cksum is in both cases the same: 1268136719 956556 > . > > I have prepared 2 files, one with uncompressed 11964 bytes, the other > with 11965 bytes uncompressed. I'll try the verbose test with the > bigger file ... Just one check: does the problem happen only with large compressed files, or does it happen also with large uncompressed files? If it doesn't in the latter case, then it might be a problem of saving the binary data from the temporary buffer. Maybe something because of the unicode merge (wild guess, I know). Best regards, Michael.