From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Things I would like to be added after the release Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:52:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180432378 5752 80.91.229.12 (29 May 2007 09:52:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 29 11:52:56 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HsyNr-00008b-T2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 11:52:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HsyNr-0000r0-DL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 05:52:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HsyNZ-0000nP-9v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 05:52:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HsyNX-0000mo-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 05:52:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HsyNX-0000mi-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 05:52:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay1.alcatel.de ([194.113.59.95]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HsyNX-0003qo-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 05:52:35 -0400 Original-Received: from slbhab.alcatel.de (slbhab.bln.sel.alcatel.de [149.204.63.218]) by mailrelay1.alcatel.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/ICT) with ESMTP id l4T9qOiY009132; Tue, 29 May 2007 11:52:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: (klaus berndl's message of "Tue, 29 May 2007 11:36:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (hpux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 149.204.45.72 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71934 Archived-At: writes: > But here is (4): Currently ECB contains a lot of compatibility-code so > ECB runs as best as possible with Emacs and XEmacs... this is a goal of > ECB and should remain as a goal. I doubt Richard wants to have XEmacs- > compatibility-code in the ECB integrated in the Emacs-trunc ;-) I can tell you from the Tramp maintainer's experience: It's not a problem to keep XEmacs compatibility code. Richard reacts indignant only if this compatibility code tampers Emacs' functionality. So far, he has always been right rebuking me :-) > Klaus Best regards, Michael.