From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: testing for a remote file to include file on a Windows mappeddrive Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:46:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871w844yff.fsf@gmx.de> <87bq781bf7.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201621565 14022 80.91.229.12 (29 Jan 2008 15:46:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jason Rumney , Michael Albinus , Drew Adams , Emacs-Devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 29 16:46:22 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JJsew-0004Bm-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:46:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJseU-0005Yj-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:45:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JJseQ-0005YW-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:45:30 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JJseO-0005YH-5o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:45:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJseO-0005YB-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:45:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailrelay1.alcatel.de ([194.113.59.95]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JJseI-0000W1-RZ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from slbhab.alcatel.de (slbhab.bln.sel.alcatel.de [149.204.63.218]) by mailrelay1.alcatel.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id m0TFjGKK021939; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:45:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:43:33 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (hpux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 149.204.45.72 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87748 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Anyway, any objection to my proposal to clarify file-remote-p's intended > semantics, and to add unhandled-file-name (tho maybe it should be > called file-local-name, to make it closer to file-local-copy which is > kind of its complement)? Just for the records: I don't object. `file-local-name' sounds good. And I'm also willing to provide the implementation for both ange-ftp and Tramp, which is simple enough ... > Stefan Best regards, Michael.