From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: debbugs.el revisited
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:30:31 -0400
Message-ID: <niy60g2u48.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3boxftd6j.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<87iprn6nic.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <m3vcvnkows.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<87aacy8i97.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <8739iq5k0c.fsf@gmx.de>
	<c88vshwkkg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <m3tyb4vnz4.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<974o348tfp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <m3hb74sami.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m3mxgwpfnf.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309645866 22554 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2011 22:31:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 22:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 03 00:31:00 2011
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qd8iH-0007C6-Sg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 00:30:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33581 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qd8iG-0008FP-Cs
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:30:56 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41481)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rgm@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qd8hu-0008F3-Pi
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:30:35 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rgm@gnu.org>) id 1Qd8ht-0004kR-3J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:30:34 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51947)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rgm@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qd8hs-0004kL-Q4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:30:32 -0400
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49764)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rgm@gnu.org>)
	id 1Qd8hs-0007Iu-3A; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:30:32 -0400
X-Spook: Glock class struggle Etacs Skipjack mindwar SDI
X-Ran: C.Rzq)|4t-lJQA|'"zho70K:LLio1n{N*RAL<j")MgLShk8cd4Y\=]Mk;2+E)YKbT5V$:2
X-Hue: yellow
X-Attribution: GM
In-Reply-To: <m3mxgwpfnf.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's
	message of "Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:54:28 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141471
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/141471>

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> I've now done this, but I couldn't find any donarmstrong messages to
> test with, for some reason or other...

Actually, recently I went back and edited all the old addresses wherever
they appeared. So that was probably a silly request, sorry. I guess any
time they still appear (which they did recently, hence me mentioning it)
is because people are replying to ~ 2 year old messages on their local
machines. Not much you can do about that...