From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stelian Iancu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Move to a cadence release model? Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:27:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83y4e4k03c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447329983 4917 80.91.229.3 (12 Nov 2015 12:06:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:06:23 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 12 13:06:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwqdp-0003vL-Ma for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:06:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46200 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwqdo-0006NL-R8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:06:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwqcq-0005U8-VL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwqcm-0004pR-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:05:12 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwqcm-0004p0-Pe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwqcj-0002aK-HI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:05:05 +0100 Original-Received: from 178.208.172.154 ([178.208.172.154]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:05:05 +0100 Original-Received: from stelian by 178.208.172.154 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:05:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.208.172.154 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: <83y4e4k03c.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194217 Archived-At: On 11/11/15 16:49, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > As I wrote earlier, "active focus on bugs" is a pipe dream as long as > the number of people who care about bugs enough to pick them up, > investigate, and work with the submitters or by themselves to debug > them is some prime number less than 3. We will never succeed in > moving forward to some more elaborate development model if we don't > have this issue covered much better than we do now. Is the bug handling process documented somehwere?