From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What's the specification for sxhash? Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 17:14:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20b88c13-e045-5079-f1de-8f16eaf80d30@gmail.com> <46cd01aa-e691-b147-87fa-76878b235f67@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="213763"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philippe Schnoebelen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 06 17:14:55 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hYu6M-000tLF-H0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 17:14:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33784 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYu6K-0006Qy-VX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 11:14:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYu68-0006PF-Sb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 11:14:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYu68-0007kU-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 11:14:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43450 helo=mx1.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYu67-0007j7-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 11:14:36 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Original-Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13726AC15; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 15:14:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: Darling, my ELBOW is FLYING over FRANKFURT, Germany.. In-Reply-To: <46cd01aa-e691-b147-87fa-76878b235f67@gmail.com> (Philippe Schnoebelen's message of "Thu, 6 Jun 2019 17:04:57 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 195.135.220.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237290 Archived-At: On Jun 06 2019, Philippe Schnoebelen wrote: > On 2019/06/06 16:45, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> For some types the hash uses the address of the object, so it is likely >> to differ even between runs of the same binary. > > What types? Symbols, for example. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."