From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Cloos Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Updates for TeX, SGML and rfc1345 quails and an assignment q Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:58:58 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112922900 25163 80.91.229.2 (8 Apr 2005 01:15:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 01:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 08 03:14:54 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJi4w-0007Dj-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:14:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJheM-0007l7-1c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJhd6-0007J9-5j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:45:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJhcy-0007Ew-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:45:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJhcw-00079p-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:45:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.240.156.239] (helo=ore.jhcloos.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DJht5-0001S9-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:02:19 -0400 Original-Received: from lugabout.jhcloos.org (host-69-48-10-81.roc.choiceone.net [69.48.10.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "lugabout.jhcloos.org", Issuer "ca.jhcloos.com" (verified OK)) by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3FF1C90F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:00:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by lugabout.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4579B4D42D2; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:58:58 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Hashcash: 0:050408:emacs-devel@gnu.org:642fe9fa5a5543e4 Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35720 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35720 I've noticed several places in the latin-ltx.el, sgml-input.el and rfc1345.el files that I believe should be updated. The changes are mostly due to characters that were added to unicode/ iso10646 since the .el files were written. Or in the case of 1345 since the rfc itself was written. (I suppose I should note the underlying assumption that these are written as utf8 input methods and therefore it should be reasonable to extend them as unicode and iso10646 are extended.) I expect the patch to cleanly apply to both HEAD and the unicode-2 branch. Given that these are merely matters of fact rather than truly creative changes, will an assignment be required before -- if approved -- they could be applied? If so, could someone send me the future template? Also, does the paperwork have to be sent to me via snail, or can the process be sped up via fax or an emailed scan? -JimC -- James H. Cloos, Jr.