From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GTK file selector Date: 18 Dec 2005 22:33:15 -0700 Message-ID: References: <871x0apnrl.fsf@marant.org> <1134959171.009619.9806.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134970799 6040 80.91.229.2 (19 Dec 2005 05:39:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: zedek@gnu-rox.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 19 06:39:51 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoDk9-0002eK-KY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:39:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoDkz-0001UO-5J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:40:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EoDkm-0001Ti-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:40:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EoDkk-0001TI-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:40:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoDkk-0001TE-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:40:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.187.233.31] (helo=mx1.redhat.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EoDnc-0003v6-QW; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBJ5cvMW029283; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:38:57 -0500 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn50-70.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.70]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jBJ5cu124286; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:38:56 -0500 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 305E32DC185; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:33:15 -0700 (MST) Original-To: ams@gnu.org X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <1134959171.009619.9806.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48040 Archived-At: >>>>> "Alfred" == Alfred M\ Szmidt writes: Tom> Incremental compilation. Alfred> For proper incremental compilation you need compiler support. Yes, I was just referring to Eclipse's Java support. Eclipse has a built-in Java compiler. The C/C++ support in Eclipse is less nice. It doesn't do incremental compilation, though I think it does try to do incremental indexing. (FWIW I once sent in a patch to Emacs to allow "kinda" incremental updates to TAGS, but afaik it never went in.) Tom