From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Another keybinding nit for afterwards Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:27:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <85d58dpjbd.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85y7qxj0ar.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162250960 14858 80.91.229.2 (30 Oct 2006 23:29:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 31 00:29:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GegYv-0005gA-21 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:29:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GegYu-00017K-HC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:29:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GegYf-00016W-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:28:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GegYd-00015S-96 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:28:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GegYd-00015L-2s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:28:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GegYS-000058-80; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:28:32 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx19.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id A0FAFFAC032; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:28:30 +0100 (CET) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85y7qxj0ar.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon\, 30 Oct 2006 16\:22\:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61441 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > With things that takes considerable from the developers, sure. I > don't know the details of doing polls. If they take a lot of time and > effort, maybe we are doing something wrong. Before making a poll, we need to present and discuss different alternatives. Doing that will take attention off the release. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk