From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Cloos Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: X11 Compound Text vs ISO 2022 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:46:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280515977 11949 80.91.229.12 (30 Jul 2010 18:52:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, david@harpegolden.net To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 30 20:52:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OeuhO-00078o-Tg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:52:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37938 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OeuhJ-0000xy-Dr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:52:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32886 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OeudU-0006V9-F8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:48:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OeudT-00041S-1j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:48:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eagle.jhcloos.com ([207.210.242.212]:53679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OeudS-000418-V7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:48:47 -0400 Original-Received: by eagle.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id D024E403B5; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:48:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=eagle; t=1280515724; bh=bc2WuTDbS3J2rQimVsSuL1Pu3twTIRod+Ei2Wo3pozM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=im1qDla8CyJ53xk3eabOGR38noc2I4WwRf5dWSwJ4LL+BDH28qzwZJPYSt+6hbvlJ owgUWjOrKuPV7qxb2kVex33C3VLQI6ocn1a7nN0Ptqm2F5XjJACIleTiXgxa7HdlG/ cJ+mZsUAyTOjwC5QT0dRtcILlyXaz4rmSAUMSBCM= Original-Received: from carbon.jhcloos.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0FC1CE9C6; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:46:55 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:27:20 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQCAYAAAAf8/9hAAAABHNCSVQICAgIfAhkiAAAAI1J REFUOE+lU9ESgCAIg64P1y+ngUdxhl5H8wFbbM0OmUiEhKkCYaZThXCo6KE5sCbA1DDX3genvO4d eBQgEMaM5qy6uWk4SfBYfdu9jvBN9nSVDOKRtwb+I3epboOsOX5pZbJNsBJFvmQQ05YMfieIBnYX FK2N6dOawd97r/e8RjkTLzmMsiVgrAoEugtviCM3v2WzjgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Copyright: Copyright 2009 James Cloos OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Original-Lines: 29 X-Hashcash: 1:30:100730:handa@m17n.org::29MpFn2GlX3ljtbm:00Fzj/u X-Hashcash: 1:30:100730:david@harpegolden.net::uW0JZDMbUdO9zPRI:0000000000000000000000000000000000000002R/L0 X-Hashcash: 1:30:100730:emacs-devel@gnu.org::S+6LZBLoXqM1N/s5:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000AC8he X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128027 Archived-At: >>>>> "KH" == Kenichi Handa writes: KH> iso-8859-1, ctext-with-extensions, utf-8 respectively in KH> this order. D'Oh. I read COMPOUND_TEXT even though you wrote ctext. :( KH> By the way, the spec of COMPOUND_TEXT (included in KH> xorg-docs-1.5) lists these registered charsets. KH> ISO8859-1 through ISO8859-9 KH> JISX0201.1976-0 KH> GB2312.1980-0 KH> JISX0208.1983-0 KH> KSC5601.1987-0 KH> but libX11-1.3.2/src/xlibi18n/lcCT.c lists many more KH> charsets (e.g. more 8859 series and all CNS11643 series). KH> I think it is better to follow the above spec than lcCT.c. KH> What do you think? The changes to the code go back many, many years, and I (as an Xorg member) expect that the spec will be updated to match the code. So I'd follow the Xlib code rather than the spec. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6