From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r103740: Remove some files that autoreconf can supply. Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:33:19 -0600 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301168036 24568 80.91.229.12 (26 Mar 2011 19:33:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 26 20:33:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3ZF8-00089z-KL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:33:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34521 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q3ZF8-00025Z-73 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54778 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q3ZEk-0001p6-E4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:33:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3ZEj-0000k2-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:33:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3ZEg-0000ja-FZ; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:33:22 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2QJXLvd007966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:33:21 -0400 Original-Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2QJXK6k021118; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2QJXJS4026396; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id B1513378D0C; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:33:19 -0600 (MDT) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:21:35 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137722 Archived-At: Stefan> Yes, that history is not really important. But we should simply always Stefan> use "bzr mv" when it can be used unless there's really a good reason Stefan> against it (never came across one, FWIW). It seems like bzr could recognize this case and ask if you intended to `bzr mv' instead. Otherwise, I think you just have to assume that people are going to make this mistake from time to time. Tom