From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [display-buffer] a way to make it behave as before? Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:59:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4DFB7705.2000401@gmx.at> <4DFF1223.5030100@gmx.at> <4DFF3BA8.3070007@gmx.at> <4E00C2C8.6040303@gmx.at> <4E0197B3.1080509@gmx.at> <4E01F1F6.2060705@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308754806 17405 80.91.229.12 (22 Jun 2011 15:00:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Katsumi Yamaoka , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 22 17:00:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZOuQ-0001su-2r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:00:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33458 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZOuO-0000gw-DF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:00:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56315) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZOu2-0000g8-1x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:59:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZOu0-0007md-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from batman.blixtvik.net ([87.96.254.3]:36241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZOtz-0007m5-Hc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:59:35 -0400 Original-Received: from chopper (139-210-96-87.cust.blixtvik.se [87.96.210.139]) by batman.blixtvik.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E617F9A54; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:59:31 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4E01F1F6.2060705@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:45:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 87.96.254.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140848 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> The best choice is to revert all your recent changes, I really, >> really believe. I also really believe that you are really >> skillful, so I really believe you will bring the new version that >> makes everyone happy, within a month. Please consider that those >> who use bzr Emacs are not necessarily the Emacs developers. > > Well this recommendation is not "really" helpful. I've set up a bzr > branch more than a year ago and asked people to try it but with the > exception of Juanma nobody did. So I have to go through with this by > annoying people in order to get some feedback. > > The only other choice I see is reverting my changes and leave the window > code to someone else. I think mot people are happy actually. I use bzr Emacs all the time and I have lots of issues but not with the window code. Anyway, one must be able to push scary changes to trunk now and then otherwise we will never get anywhere. > martin -- Joakim Verona