From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Maintainer overview Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:09:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83oc0fdsgg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311840584 31585 80.91.229.12 (28 Jul 2011 08:09:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 28 10:09:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmLf2-000667-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:09:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43439 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmLer-0008KW-Qk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:09:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36689) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmLep-0008Bn-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:09:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmLen-0001ZU-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:09:27 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:34543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmLen-0001ZN-KJ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:09:25 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=quimbies.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QmLed-0008Mr-3b; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:09:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:57:25 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEXPvrf+/vL9++ry6tsG BhAEAwsQDxr79uZ8a3Do3NCOEuSoAAACU0lEQVQ4jV3UsW7bMBAGYCZLrFHsEHQUPRDdit4gaJeI PoBs5AEEQmvlgavbsjK1CdAQ8G37HyU7ag+IE/PzHe8oOmIW2Sz+jyxGAYgfK/P2qWyFR0pErH8t CeKjQhVTkTssIoRx7EOKSaBCtmXM/oRoWry0E96KSCJy4fkPlmrGBDFbAEioZv8mQtrmkCAuVWqE KsBhg9/riiD+FXcwLZwxC1ooVlmCg91KERGgpPg1GwHB2sClCIUSXGjO/Pfr2FuLUQBEVQX45mhe vAlj33V34FHcoB3gzXY9J4R2AmB/4QrtYunPobYhXNPmfGCz0EofM/JvAevhMSBAFeoYAYcAuu4g z+VxId/amqNr9vAFgMW2bvh1WmiD/DODsba2+DHoqvoHQuj7wBDXORjKiz+d0dQIqKe4xD2Y9FzH FhnLR4YDYAODBDMtFfH1ABwH7U9o1TZNW5v7WQEugx7rrq7TKOZ2YYgM9EN7w9PVhgEPotqgkL5N wBkvRBfaAQ+IOJnnI/EufCRLLnEktuOsxjy9MhDg9T3/tAK3a59yTaVzCQrt0wY8i/2JNqkcRC51 mb/6+r5uX4ocxfaASp0x5rnI5YWckIVyCmBG2/HJm1sCEkrJwUl/StfEms7ccG8SDIXSgDOuWz9i eIBjKIo81wowhtHyJjfnACVPnkvAKbWUMhClS4DJ07eJJZVyblhBrXBuOlv/UoChEEWC0T7iphny LWP3X+Od9ygSqBRSO4d7Xg6KEz4A86JLtKOkcyqBVGpggBCqKJnerMCBVE3E5aUE/AUfQVhWZsBw 7wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Chris & Cosey's _Exotika_: "BeatBeatBeat" X-Hashcash: 1:23:110728:eliz@gnu.org::ZHkXVeaIZQxF5qjm:00000HjOW X-Hashcash: 1:23:110728:emacs-devel@gnu.org::EFCdqZr0zw7HIE+m:000000000000000000000000000000000000000001IkGc X-MailScanner-ID: 1QmLed-0008Mr-3b MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1312445355.17491@ePdVb6jEK8Zf3jHoK13X6w X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142434 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Maybe we should take a step back and talk about the goals of this > feature. Is this just to be nice to those who don't read > bug-gnu-emacs and send them a notification? Or do we want to make > sure every bug is assigned to some "victim"? These are different > goals, and the solutions are likely to be different. I was thinking only of the former. In particular, when doing bug triage it would be nice if debbugs-gnu knew that cperl and org and etc were primarily handled by people who don't necessarily read emacs-bugs religiously. I mean, I know the first two, but I don't know "etc". So having that knowledge in a machine-parseable form would aid bringing a bug report to the attention of people who knows how to fix the bug. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/