From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two questions about thumbs.el Date: 26 Apr 2004 18:39:21 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040426104147.5042.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082992215 13104 80.91.224.253 (26 Apr 2004 15:10:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 26 17:09:57 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BI7k4-0001xS-00 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:09:56 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BI7k4-0002r1-00 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:09:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BI7dB-0007vO-3y for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:02:49 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BI7P6-00052f-RZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:48:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BI7Mh-0004bB-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BI7Gl-00027n-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:39:39 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 47097 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2004 14:39:38 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2004 14:39:38 -0000 Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: <20040426104147.5042.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> Original-Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22179 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22179 Juanma Barranquero writes: > Third question (yeah, I lied on the subject): There are at least eight > versions of the time-less-p code: > > calendar/time-date: time-less-p > calendar/timeclock: timeclock-time-less-p > pcomplete: pcomplete-time-less-p > speedbar: speedbar-check-obj-this-line (fragment) > thumbs: time-less-p > autoload: autoload-before-p > eshell/esh-util: eshell-time-less-p > net/tramp-smb: tramp-smb-time-less-p (fragment) > > speedbar, eshell and tramp have a life outside of Emacs, so they need > their own definitions for compatibility, but the others could be > "reunified" by using calendar/time-date's version (time-date.elc is > quite small, about 4K). This functionality is obviously generally useful. Maybe time-less-p should be defined in subr.el? > Note: I'm not sure about autoload, because without testing it I don't > know if there'll be a problem for autoload to use an autoloaded function. I don't this that's a problem, but in any case defining it in subr.el would fix that nevertheless. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk