From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:01:06 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87pt3m5vqk.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <87zn2mh5jk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87is99nznd.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200410172053.i9HKrdL01136@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200410190158.i9J1wrH25523@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87wtxmzkz4.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098273764 19292 80.91.229.6 (20 Oct 2004 12:02:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 20 14:02:35 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKFAp-0006mq-00 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:02:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKFIC-0003t9-IG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKFHs-0003t3-Ej for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKFHs-0003sr-2b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKFHr-0003so-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:09:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CKF9P-0007lu-88 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:01:07 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 51856 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 12:01:04 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 12:01:04 -0000 Original-To: Alexander Pohoyda In-Reply-To: <87wtxmzkz4.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> (Alexander Pohoyda's message of "19 Oct 2004 19:17:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28658 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28658 Alexander Pohoyda writes: > storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > >> So what's the point in the whole discussion ? > > I thought that issuing a message makes no sense when how-many function > is called from a LISP code. That was my bad idea to use > (interactive-p) here. I'm sorry for this. > > My last patch does not use interactive-p. Do you see any other > problems why it is not accepted yet? Actually, we are a couple of persons who think interactive-p was the correct thing to use there... -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk