From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: called by a process filter? Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:34:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <874qd95xet.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115977065 6629 80.91.229.2 (13 May 2005 09:37:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 13 11:37:42 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWbN-0001BA-Ek for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 11:37:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWkU-0000iQ-Kl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:46:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWbF-000325-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:36:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWbD-000316-QY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:36:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWWbD-00030o-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:36:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DWWg3-0003Bh-14 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 05:41:51 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 33160 invoked from network); 13 May 2005 09:34:45 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 13 May 2005 09:34:45 -0000 Original-To: Kevin Rodgers In-Reply-To: (Kevin Rodgers's message of "Thu, 12 May 2005 10:10:33 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37070 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37070 Kevin Rodgers writes: > There certainly is a better way, suggested on gnu.emacs.sources several > years ago by Dave Love, but I haven't had the time to properly > generalize it. What I'd like to do right now is help someone using my > legacy code, with a patch to work around this problem. Asking for a change to emacs internals to support your legacy code isn't a good reason in itself. And it won't fix the problem for users using older emacs releases. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk