From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: shell-command - missing shell-quote-argument for program? Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:34:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <452517DC.5010007@student.lu.se> <45251C56.8010603@student.lu.se> <4526401C.7060604@student.lu.se> <85vemx38yq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160141846 19456 80.91.229.2 (6 Oct 2006 13:37:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , Lennart Borgman , Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 06 15:37:24 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVpro-0005Qj-AJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:35:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVprn-0007Yy-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:35:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GVpra-0007Rj-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:35:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GVprY-0007Lv-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVprX-0007LE-TP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GVpyP-0004t6-4T; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id BD6FB8A00A9; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:35:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85vemx38yq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Fri\, 06 Oct 2006 14\:49\:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60466 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: >> I don't know, but I would assume there are more bash than csh users >> these days? So maybe that should be changed to explicit-bash-args ? > > I think it should be changed to the shell name used most often on > systems that are predominantly GNU. Agree. > It may be that "explicit-sh-args" would actually be more often what is > used rather than "explicit-bash-args" since I would suspect that using > bash under the "sh" name is pretty common. I hope not! That would defeat the troubles we go through to setup explicit-bash-args. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk